Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic).

نویسندگان

  • Thomas McGinn
  • Peter C Wyer
  • Thomas B Newman
  • Sheri Keitz
  • Rosanne Leipzig
  • Gordon Guyatt For
چکیده

I magine that you're a busy family physician and that you've found a rare free moment to scan the recent literature. Reviewing your preferred digest of abstracts, you notice a study comparing emergency physicians' interpretation of chest radiographs with radiologists' interpretations. 1 The article catches your eye because you have frequently found that your own reading of a radiograph differs from both the official radiologist reading and an unofficial reading by a different radiologist, and you've wondered about the extent of this disagreement and its implications. Looking at the abstract, you find that the authors have reported the extent of agreement using the κ statistic. You recall that κ stands for " kappa " and that you have encountered this measure of agreement before, but your grasp of its meaning remains tentative. You therefore choose to take a quick glance at the authors' conclusions as reported in the abstract and to defer downloading and reviewing the full text of the article. Practitioners, such as the family physician just described, may benefit from understanding measures of observer variability. For many studies in the medical literature, clinician readers will be interested in the extent of agreement among multiple observers. For example, do the investigators in a clinical study agree on the presence or absence of physical, radiographic or laboratory findings? Do investigators involved in a systematic overview agree on the validity of an article, or on whether the article should be included in the analysis? In perusing these types of studies, where investigators are interested in quantifying agreement, clinicians will often come across the kappa statistic. In this article we present tips aimed at helping clinical learners to use the concepts of kappa when applying diagnostic tests in practice. The tips presented here have been adapted from approaches developed by educators experienced in teaching evidence-based medicine skills to clini-cians. 2 A related article, intended for people who teach these concepts to clinicians, is available online at www. Defining the importance of kappa • Understand the difference between measuring agreement and measuring agreement beyond chance. • Understand the implications of different values of kappa. • Understand the basics of how the kappa score is calculated. • Understand the importance of " chance agreement " in estimating kappa. • Understand how to calculate the kappa score given different distributions of positive and negative results. • Understand that the more extreme the distributions of positive …

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Effects of Heart Rate Variability on Reading Performance among Iranian EFL Learners

Psychophysiological studies and MRI neuro-imaging findings provide evidence that heart rate variability (HRV) which is in control of our emotions affects our brain cognitive centers. It has been shown that coherent heart-brain interaction can change the pattern of the afferent cardiac input that is sent to the brain. For this purpose, the Institute of HeartMath (IHM) has proposed a kind of biof...

متن کامل

Observer agreement, chest auscultation, and crackles in asbestos-exposed workers.

Investigators cite observer variability as a problem in using crackles to diagnose asbestosis. We measured agreement on the presence or absence of crackles noted during auscultation of 64 asbestos-exposed workers in order to clarify this question. There was 89 percent agreement between two observers who simultaneously examined subjects breathing from functional residual capacity (FRC). Kappa (k...

متن کامل

Inter- and intra-observer agreement of Prechtl's method on the qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants.

BACKGROUND Prechtl's method on the qualitative assessment of general movements (GMs) has been shown to be a good predictor of neurological outcome. There is substantial evidence that this method has good inter- and intra-observer agreement. AIMS We wanted to find out whether this high agreement is reproducible in the clinical setting. STUDY DESIGN Reliability study (inter- and intra-observe...

متن کامل

Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat.

Physicians, patients and policy-makers are influenced not only by the results of studies but also by how authors present the results. Depending on which measures of effect authors choose, the impact of an intervention may appear very large or quite small, even though the underlying data are the same. In this article we present 3 measures of effect — relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduct...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne

دوره 171 11  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004